Sports FAQ
Home / Basketball

Okafor, Huo Fude, Aldridge 3 post player comparison

huang72317392010-03-04 03:10:38 +0000 #1
, such as title, detailed technical characteristics point (do not copy the Encyclopaedia)
382,414,7772010-03-04 03:26:41 +0000 #2
Okafor, capping ability, this season, 1.7 months. There is no doubt in the ability to vote is definitely stronger than the Chandler. However, you rarely see this year's top ten Hornets flying buckle it, reason is that Okafor and Paul Chandler, the same can not be like the perfect integration, so now take less space. Although we can not always fly button, but it can be in the cast, countervailing, scoring 11 points with Chandler at about the same time. Actually, he and Chandler, like, nor is it 100% of healthy individuals

Huo Fude, 9.8 rebounds and nearly 10, meaning he averaged a near double-double player, encounter some weak weak inside, you can still Da Bao's , but it can only be as strong if the copies of the coolies. Pick up the front panel capability. After the field and grabbed rebounds like straight after the killing before the courts, I think about all the teams as long as the Hawks often allowed to kill the basket center dribble straight bar. Hawks inside the barrier, without him, an eagle is absolutely impossible for the first four positions. We can see his importance

LaMarcus Aldridge, who also has a soft touch, so he is generally more offensive side box. Well before the market rebounds. Defensive rebounding ability in general (which is not the Trail Blazers rebound the ball because many people?) Not in front of two strong explosive force. Bad back baskets.

Power rankings somewhat difficult Oh
Sun God2010-03-04 03:46:14 +0000 #3
France
megamanzerogeo2010-03-04 04:33:48 +0000 #4
Emeka Okafor: defensive center, has some features of a traditional center (up to a little slow). Huofu De: versatile center, with new features of the concept of center (up to 1:00 pace is not slow) LaMarcus Aldridge: offensive power forward, not a rotten basket of technology and a good investment in capacity. (I think it is enhanced version of the Tuscola).

Reply

Name:
Content:


Other posts in this category