Sports FAQ
Home / Basketball

Why not let Tracy McGrady Rockets play?

yap_soso2010-02-07 13:02:00 +0000 #1
If the boss bent to trade T-Mac, it should enhance the value of his deal, so he will take more performance in fishes, why McGrady is only several minutes, had two points do not warm-up on the next, and so who would dare to To Tracy McGrady ah.
xiaoheng192010-02-07 13:09:37 +0000 #2
First of all, Tracy McGrady hurt for a very long time, even as a re-play will not be much, but let those who have Tracy McGrady to give up illusions of potential buyers.

Second, McGrady currently the largest transaction value is his big expiring contract, so Tracy McGrady to play better, get the greater the probability of a new contract, then as a space for the purpose of salary Teng buyers will be hesitant.

Finally, NBA players involved hardly any interest in trading, unlike football could make a transfer fee, but a purely technical considerations, selection of trading McGrady also wish to improve the Rockets lineup. From a technical point of view, to undermine the Rockets Tracy McGrady played the current lineup rotation; in there and we were getting used again, when Tracy McGrady out of his deal, is pieces of their stupid things.
guduzhejimo2010-02-07 13:36:27 +0000 #3
because it will undermine the chemistry reflect! !
1 Kanesada 1112010-02-07 13:57:05 +0000 #4
Rockets are now the key to every game, T-MAC performance not how good you let him go up so why.
canbywang2010-02-07 13:32:48 +0000 #5
1. just tell people that he can play only the contract that the team can be contributing to a vital year;

2. once the contract expires, and this value is more than McGrady had 30 points can now be important to too many;

3. the rocket system in Adelman view, McGrady is superfluous, so no need to let him play more
yanlong6622010-02-07 15:27:57 +0000 #6
blog.sina.com.cn/s/b...b18c09d0100gkkk.html

look at this you Old beams will understand it very reasonable
rainroadlu2010-02-07 14:31:17 +0000 #7
Tracy McGrady in Houston Moxi, and change is in the affirmative, in order to provide salary-cap space for next year

Reply

Name:
Content:


Other posts in this category