Sports FAQ
Home / Football

Bei Liming was traded or not, on the inside as well as the Bosman ruling.

100% _Werder2010-01-21 21:02:03 +0000 #1
Village Bei Liming 28 years of it, Real Madrid is not based on Bosman ruling, only dig a little bit of euros Franck Ribery scored. G14 Real gentlemen's agreement will not be overlooked? There is the most important point I want to ask: Franck Ribery how the breach of contract payments to the operator? Real Madrid do is to pay? Does not that sound a lot. Or should Bosman ruling rather than pay for it?

Contents of the bill:

club and player contracts for the longest period of 5 years

28 years of age players (not including the 28-year-old) since the date of the signing of the contract within the contract to be protected for three years, followed by two years, ready to accept Other clubs offer, but then once he agreed to join a new team, the new team will pay an equivalent of the rest of his contract salary as compensation for

28 years (including) the more players the corresponding period of protection for two years

the last six months, and all contracts belong to the termination phase of the contract, any club as long as it gives the player the satisfaction of the contract, then the player will be able to contract after the end of the last six months, a free transfer to the new club and new club without paying any fees to the original Club

This is a point on the contract note

there are 16 years of age on the European Youth training contracts

a signed contract for one year only, and can freely move to other clubs, and the new club will have to be paid to the original Club sum of compensation in order to encourage training for training young


Zezheng2010-01-21 21:18:20 +0000 #2
li Bei Liming 28 years of it, Real Madrid is not based on Bosman ruling, only dig a little bit of euros Franck Ribery scored. G14 Real gentlemen's agreement will not be overlooked?

A: Franck Ribery's move to the current situation, with the Bosman ruling irrelevant Louzhu may not fully understand the bill, you can think of Lou Zhu signed Franck Ribery and Bayern with just 26 years old, regardless of yesterday, Today or tomorrow, how the age of Franck Ribery, about his transfer and the Bosman ruling has nothing to do!

Lane Berry's contract with Bayern to June 2011, if the winter transfer period this season, Ribery still not transfer, but rather onto the next summer, that bargaining power is not the hands of Bayern , but at the buyer's club, because if next summer is not sold, then to the 2011 contract expired, he would become a second Barak, a free transfer other teams! but even a child have to Bayern no!

Also: G14 What is the gentleman's agreement agreement?

I did not think out what is meant!

well as the most important point I want to ask: Franck Ribery how the breach of contract payments to the operator?

A: It can be understood as a transfer fee is determined by the two sides after the club to discuss a common decision (of course there are players here, my opinion)!

Is to pay Real Madrid do?

A: Not necessarily, but by buying his new club to a sum of money than the club wanted him to Real Madrid 1!

Does not that sound a lot. Or should Bosman ruling rather than pay for it?

A: As I said above, Franck Ribery's move with the Bosman ruling had nothing!

I personally do not agree with Bosman ruling, I have an information on the Internet looking for, Louzhu can refer to this:

Time to enter the 21st century, the world soccer is with incredible speed forward ! The new century, we have seen such a football Abu oligarchs saw Real Madrid this business empire and saw all the inside stories on the transfer market, the new phenomenon means that there must be a new system to restrain Bosman ruling in the past in the decade ahead to promote football to make a contribution, but now, it outlived the!

UEFA has been repeatedly discussed the need for the continued existence of Bosman ruling, but the undeniable point is that the Bosman ruling to the European transfer market more freely, so that the player's revenue is more lucrative, but it also is Third World countries more players get the opportunity to prove himself. However, the 21st century, Bosman has become increasingly evident shortcomings of the bill, he would let small club was untenable for the average player is facing a crisis of unemployment has kept the transfer market emerges out of too much foam. Such an argument without a detailed introduction of bills have been too hasty in football, from the day he was introduced, it has been destined to be the new Act replaced the outcome!

Despite 10 years of adjustment and adaptation, all clubs have found a response to the negative impact of Bosman ruling means that they and the players signed a long-term contracts, set sky-high price of the liquidated damages, but also introduced the players based on performance of the "flexible wage ", but the efforts of football transfer market is still not allow an orderly return. Karpin require equal treatment of non-EU players, Ashley Cole called the players the right to contact with other clubs, they were known as the "Bosman second"! At the same time, the EU believes that the provisions of the transfer fee free to seek employment with the European Union contrary to the law, thus requiring the complete abolition of transfer system, although this time football victory over politics, but also from another aspect of the Bosman ruling reflects the vulnerability.

The implementation of a 10-year Bosman ruling should or should not continue? This topic enough to spend 10 days 10 nights come and argue, but under the new situation, it clearly can not keep up the pace of the times. Forward in the Bill is increasingly becoming the shackles of football, the UEFA and the European Union may soon embark on another power games!

Reply

Name:
Content:


Other posts in this category