Sports FAQ
Home / Football

Arsenal Porto game on an indirect free kick that can quickly send Why?

interlivelong2010-04-07 00:10:31 +0000 #1
Peng Bon2010-04-07 00:17:30 +0000 #2
cases under the ball, any ball penalty is beneficial to offensive side, as long as the referee, and attack the right side is the quick foul of. Henry is just as quick on the Chelsea penalty, when he had consulted the referee, the referee said I could.

The ball, of course the greatest responsibility for Fabianski. However, Arsenal have the entire branch is responsible for the ball. The request of the referee Fabianski really need the ball to come out, but he can handle better, be with the referee that good, so good side ranked players took the ball to hand over the wall. The Arsenal players should quickly row actually good wall.

Referee also to blame. Yes he can keep a good man defensive wall on the side row out free throws, but he blocked the defensive side wall of players who discharged his station that is the question! I can be heard referees have the right to stop the defensive player ranked one side wall!

In fact, after all, not a hand to catch Fabianski. . . Tell the truth that the ball directly kicked out just fine. . . Also there is no pressure. . . Hand then why?
Joanfighting2010-04-07 00:30:46 +0000 #3
Yes, Arsenal so in the tank, and referees are not people mad at me, Fabianski is also too young, not likely to deal with this ball
better Chen Shiyan2010-04-07 00:45:36 +0000 #4
hey, I saw that dispute the ball, in fact, can be reasonably given, Fabianski is indeed illegal, but according to FIFA rules, keep Arsenal side that is completely decorated the wall time, but when the referee did not give the value of time , and intentionally or unintentionally blocked Campbell's defense! This can not be said to conspiracy ah, huh, huh, plus Manchester United's Michael Carrick sent off yesterday, hey, now the Premier League really be squeezed UEFA. . .
Inn_1802010-04-07 00:33:16 +0000 #5



Other posts in this category