Sports FAQ
Home / Mixed Martial Arts

UFC 138 and the Trouble With Tape-Delay - Ben Fowlkes

Onion2011-11-12 06:18:26 +0000 #1
I was gonna post this in the Munoz thread, which seems to be more about tape-delay spoilers than the Munoz call out, but figured that thread had derailed enough already.

This was on the main page. Good write up by Fowlkes.

Well, I tried. I did my best to honor the sanctity of tape delay, to make it an entire day without spoilers so I could sit down to watch UFC 138 on Saturday night as if it was a live event. In my hubris, I thought it would be easy. I thought I could, through sheer force of will, make the Spike TV tape delay a non-issue. I thought I'd be able to enjoy UFC 138 like it was any other event. I was so, so wrong.

I didn't go into this without a plan. I knew the internet would be a minefield, and that if I so much as opened my web browser my homepage (, naturally) would spoil it for me.

Twitter was totally out of the question. Facebook? I have way too many British and European fight fans as friends. Since the entire world seemed to be getting the event live, I knew I'd have to avoid entirely the very medium that connected me to the world.

And I did it. I watched the Facebook prelims, and then I resolved to shut my laptop until the Spike broadcast started some five hours later. Thus disconnected, I thought I was home free. Then my phone buzzed with a text message from a friend. I should have thought twice before checking it, but habit got the better of me. That's about when my day was ruined.

The text was, let's just say, unnecessarily unkind to Chris Leben. The text also assumed that I'd been following the action live and had seen the cut stoppage already. When I replied that I had not, along with a few choice obscenities for my fight-spoiling friend, the next text was unnecessarily unkind toward me, with even more choice obscenities in response.

So there it was. Now I knew, and I could not un-know. I still had to wait a couple hours for the broadcast on Spike TV, when I would tweet along with the action for the other sad sacks who were seeing it for the first time on tape delay, but I admit that I felt like the one kid in the neighborhood who was still clinging to a hollow belief in Santa Claus.

The weird part was, only the main event had been spoiled for me. I still didn't know what happened in the Brad Pickett-Renan Barao fight. I'd even maintained an impressive degree of ignorance with regards to the fate of Thiago Alves. So why couldn't I enjoy it as if it was live?

Maybe it was just the fact that other people knew. Maybe it was that half the fun of watching fights is the idea that anything can happen, and none of us can know for sure how it will end. Unless, that is, some of us get to watch it live while others get tortured by the same few commercials on Spike TV hours after the fact.

Over the years, I've gotten up ridiculously early and stayed up ridiculously late to watch live MMA events on foreign soil. Neither is especially fun, but I've come to the conclusion that it's better to be a zombie for the rest of the day and get your results as they come in rather than be well rested and intentionally ignorant.

And sure, you could argue that no one can complain about seeing the event a little late as long as it's on free TV, but stay with that reasoning and see where it goes. If Spike TV showed UFC 138 the following day, is it worth complaining about then? How about a week later?

As the difficulty in avoiding real-time results tells us, we live in the age of instant information. The UFC knows it, as does Spike TV. So why go through the sad charade of tape-delayed events? Wouldn't it be better to broadcast live to an interested audience in the afternoon than to a ghost town in the evening?

Maybe the boxing fans of 80 years ago could wait weeks to see the moving pictures of a fight, but they didn't have Twitter. They didn't have "friends" who would text them unsolicited live commentary. Instead they had polio and fireside chats. All things considered, I'd rather live in our age than theirs. I'd also rather watch my MMA live, no matter what time of day it is, than get a warmed-over broadcast in primetime.

seansloan2011-11-12 06:25:13 +0000 #2
I clicked the forum without thinking and had the Leben fight "spoiled".I still enjoyed the show though
Grapehead2011-11-12 06:47:41 +0000 #3
See Ben Fowlkes gets it and stayed off the internet all together. I don't know what the **** that danl08 guys problem was. I think it's incredibly stupid to play things on tape delay, considering how much of sports is dependent on the thrill of not knowing. You have to wonder how many people had this "spoiled" for them and didn't bother watching the event at all. There has to be a considerable decrease in viewership in scenarios like this. Not to mention the fact that the "best country in the world" is the only place that had to watch it on tape delay basically. What a crock of ****, the whole concept of tape delay.
split decision2011-11-12 07:35:36 +0000 #4
I've had it happen to me more than once. I just kick myself afterwards. So often when I log on to my computer I surf MMA sites out of force of habit. There have been a few occasions when I had something recorded and forgot about it, then saw the outcome of at least one fight on this site or others. So I either watch it or I don't.

No sense lashing out at the community, obviously.
seansloan2011-11-12 07:35:54 +0000 #5
Dan I love you
Onion2011-11-12 08:36:35 +0000 #6
There have been times where I watch a UFC the next day, and while watching the fights I check out guys record on Sherdog, while I watch their fight. The I realize I am a bonehead when their record shows that they won/lost the very fight I am watching.

Generally, I avoid all of the interwebs as the results are posted everywhere from sports sites to Facebook. Even sports channel need to be avoided as results are on the ticker.



Other posts in this category