Sports FAQ
Home / Soccer

Now 'C Lo' and 'big Ronaldo' technology better than that?

KAKAOL__COM2010-03-27 08:11:05 +0000 #1

cry of the Netherlands2010-03-27 08:23:33 +0000 #2
his ball, his extraordinary, his Paowei. Single-pole, the god of the ball, played as a maximum number of times but the goalkeeper is not a defender, had the most off the players but the goalkeeper was not defensive, and this is that we are fat Ronaldo, we will never love Ronaldo when it comes to him, not help to is a kind of respect.

Century the greatest threat to this goal the other players of the last century is estimated that you will remember Van Basten named a god, if you deny it, I have nothing to say.

Of his efforts, and the moment the outbreak, C Luo elusive. Originally wanted to introduce you to look at Ronaldo's body structure, organization, word too lazy to play.

Sticky ball dribbling skills is no doubt that Ronaldo is not C Luo Qiang, location not the same, the technical characteristics of its own is certainly not the same, C Lo on the left, the kind of opponents will tremble, and his passing, extraordinary fancy, ornamental of large, Ronaldo is a direct visual impact stronger.

Like a free-kick in, C Luo delicate feet law, Shidalichen than fat Luo Qiang.

Ronaldo reached the striker Didier Drogba, the striker simply compare, Messi is not a shooter type.

However, C Lo Que Mo Ronaldo in the side position of high status. Are the world's best, or the phrase not the same technical features. Ronaldo scored only born, C Luo is the core of the team.

Ronaldo to Inter Milan after the unification football,

C Lo Premiership Champions League so far is the unification. Poor performance on a big slice of it. C refueling.
Finger faint smoke2010-03-27 08:40:35 +0000 #3
I think it is his skill C Lo

Of course, in a more comprehensive shot in Romania wins big in other areas too much

header, long-range, better free-kick C Lo C Lo

In addition to physical is better than the big Romanian
Asahi Gauss2010-03-27 09:02:45 +0000 #4
C Ronaldo's fancy footwork, but the fake can go past opponents, Ronaldo is faster stronger explosive force, but the action did not fancy Luo C, there are quasi-degrees. Personally, I think C Ronaldo Robbie technology better. This is just my personal thoughts. Do you think?
ben9001202010-03-27 09:39:24 +0000 #5
Now technology c Luo Well, but I remember when big breakthrough in Romania very practical. Now the ball is also talk about technology, ah, body and speed is the most important. Like c Luo were better but also because good health, fast, otherwise it is the Ronaldinho of the. Do not think that Ronaldinho did not technologies, and just not physically as before, so technology can scrap it. Personally, I feel great when I was younger Lo's body and speed should be in c Luo above techniques I think that as long as a breakthrough, with your feet, shooting technique Haojiu Xing, and rather than ornamental. This type of talent like the Luo do not know when will be there.
Mexican carbazole2010-03-27 09:49:29 +0000 #6
beyond reproach. . .

Big Lo!

Go look at his video bar you can see out of the

C Lo. . . Hey
Fly pirate rabbit2010-03-27 10:54:26 +0000 #7
Western Red City, and strawberries that taste better?

I just want to say Romania is a big alien ...



Other posts in this category