Sports FAQ
Home / Soccer

Why is the boss of Manchester City Manchester United do not have to buy Manchester City takeover?

27435517472010-02-04 09:01:52 +0000 #1
I read the news, I heard that Manchester City boss seems now invested more than 1 billion pounds, and

this cost, they can already bought Manchester United in LA, why he did not buy Manchester United, but to buy one

middle reaches of the team? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
yqdex2010-02-04 09:10:11 +0000 #2
follow the example of Abu chant and then invest the acquisition team to play the middle can cause the ranks of wealthy rival, he was looked NB
branding yIn_II2010-02-04 09:42:01 +0000 #3
is simple because the acquisition of Manchester United would not let him ... or he does not like Manchester United
Small carry2010-02-04 09:54:27 +0000 #4
Manchester United boss can not allow the acquisition injection
kaoshuawo1232010-02-04 09:18:47 +0000 #5
buy wealthy fail to reflect his strong capital, only the middle or the upper reaches of the acquisition team, through its huge amount of capital to build out the wealthy is the intent of these wealthy people

By the same token, Prior to the Abu took over Chelsea, Chelsea the same can not be considered an absolute Noble
Lonely End2010-02-04 10:18:13 +0000 #6
Manchester United's debt, more terror than Manchester City, Glazer family simply did not spend a cent, full空手套白狼to Manchester United private of.
20308203082010-02-04 10:21:37 +0000 #7
income can not afford!
Qiaodan062010-02-04 12:29:26 +0000 #8
My demons are able to reach an agreement with the casual acquisition of Mody. .
cdt12162010-02-04 12:43:52 +0000 #9
he wants to rebuild a strong team and did not want to eat someone else's leftovers!

Reply

Name:
Content:


Other posts in this category