Sports FAQ
Home / Soccer

Olympic Games, World Cup, which is better

dcx1987812010-02-04 19:01:04 +0000 #1
from a fair point of view, can not be with a personal touch! From the ratings, from the state as a result of economic trigger, from the influence of the world is! Thank the
Blue Devils shark tears2010-02-04 19:15:55 +0000 #2
This no doubt about the World Cup is definitely better, because the Olympics is the Olympic team, Olympic team is composed of players under the age of 24, while the national team is a country composed of the best players, there is no limit, so in general a higher level team, and many countries do not attach great importance to the Olympic Games football matches, thus excluding the lineup is not the strongest, and many countries do not directly participate in the Olympic Games in Football . But the overwhelming majority of countries in the World Cup very seriously
chx57122010-02-04 19:06:28 +0000 #3
are very influential event! ! ! From a personal point of view: Sports fans like the Olympic Games; fans still prefer the World Cup
nickyufang2010-02-04 20:23:39 +0000 #4
Olympic Games is a sports nation as a whole integrated evaluation

World Cup's influence although great, but from an economic point of view, then touch will be lower than the Olympic Games, but the World Cup is still the outside world at the Olympic Games, one of the most talked about games!
Mark _ Yi2010-02-04 20:30:12 +0000 #5
World Cup
rocbot2010-02-04 20:07:22 +0000 #6
World Cup
The Divine Comedy Hai Zi2010-02-04 19:40:51 +0000 #7
the world's first movement is football: "a roll of the ball to dominate the world", saying that is the world's largest sports - football, which swept the five continents , no shake supremacy.

In addition to other parts of the United States, soccer is very popular.

Football per game attendance of more than tens of thousands, Barcelona's attendance is 98107. The NBA, the Lakers only more than 1.

F1, tennis, the influence of these movements is far more than basketball.

Basketball was only to see China is much more ---
Wei Zheng snow I love you2010-02-04 20:27:18 +0000 #8
of course the World Cup, Olympic Games, a lot of items are rubbish, simply no one would watch the
MICHAELRAN12010-02-04 21:32:49 +0000 #9
see you are not a football fan of!
Items drizzle2010-02-04 21:36:37 +0000 #10
Olympic Games
swallow_gouw2010-02-04 23:58:44 +0000 #11
Olympic Games, but individual screenings, and ratings of individual projects far less than the World Cup final, or any of a semi-final. I think it is almost the other.
3C1962010-02-04 21:04:16 +0000 #12
Though I am a football fan, but as far as possible from an impartial point of view bar. First of all you say the ratings, I think the Olympics should be slightly better, after all, it is a comprehensive sports event, which has no shortage of eye-catching projects (for example, basketball, as long as a certain NBA superstars to participate in the ratings high; of course, including football), coupled with the overall needs of governments out of the total, while in the media who obtained outstanding results on the length of the project not hesitate to report the ratings are not naturally low; from the country's own economy is concerned, I think course ought to football. I have heard a saying that the country is hosting the Olympic Games is not really profitable, and I this may be hearsay, but the host Olympic Games is indeed spending a lot of money. The World Cup might be on the slightly stronger point, after all, only the construction of a soccer stadium that the required facilities, such as the Olympics are not over. And I heard that the World Cup than the Olympics to attract more tourists (this is hearsay or a); from the world's influence, I think that will take several World Cup, and one because of the popularity of the sport in the world and the popularity; second I feel like the Olympics is a kind of high society derived from things like the World Cup less than a universal force.
qingshuishenwu2010-02-04 21:44:45 +0000 #13
Louzhu Hello, the light from the economy, of course, the World Cup. Because the Olympic Games there is no sponsor, the income is only a number of tickets and related industries, the stadium prohibits the warning light for license type! The World Cup sponsors allowed, thus eliminating the need for stadium construction and maintenance costs, to the host country considerable growth in the earnings, while in the nineties after the Olympic Games gradually get rid of, if not ramble out of the situation. Olympic Games and World Cup events are the World Cup there are 208 member countries, the final stage of 32 participating countries, the Olympic 204-member, from the grand occasion held view of almost the same, but economically difficult than the world in terms of Olympic Games cup!
MBoston2010-02-05 00:44:49 +0000 #14
I personally think that is the World Cup even more outstanding some of my reasons are as follows

1, football is the world's largest sports, the whole is only during the World Cup football matches and is the world's top players play, while the Olympic Games many projects can be seen as tasteless items, ornamental is not high, many small events, especially the preliminaries, and few viewers

2, culture, the Olympic Games has now developed into the exchange of friendship from the beginning to the present deformed become competitive and medals purposes. In some developed countries soccer, football has even been seen as a cultural, an essential element of daily life, even seven ten days old, they will be the team of their own country as their children, which in the the spirit of the Olympic Games, only the individual expression.

3, the time the World Cup than the Olympics, and has also had a certain impact on

most simply, the Olympics is the world's athletes festival, while the World Cup soccer fans around the world holiday.



Other posts in this category