Sports FAQ
Home / Tennis

Ran with the Hawkeye tennis, why not always use Hawkeye penalty to ensure the penalty accurate? Hawk

jingfaazimung2010-02-03 10:01:16 +0000 #1

630,783,9412010-02-03 10:10:58 +0000 #2
If you do not restrict the use of Hawkeye the opportunity, will largely affect the fluency of the game. Their own tennis game a long time long, if every player can be many challenges in Hawkeye, then the game will be frequently interrupted, will be time to drag on even longer. This is not conducive to television coverage.

Say good
Hallelujah 0072010-02-03 10:33:10 +0000 #3
because of this decision by the General Assembly in order to manipulate the outcome of games.

Games are not totally fair!
wjkvincent2010-02-03 10:12:36 +0000 #4
If you do not restrict the use of Hawkeye the opportunity, will largely affect the fluency of the game. Their own tennis game a long time long, if every player can be many challenges in Hawkeye, then the game will be frequently interrupted, will be time to drag on even longer. This is not conducive to television coverage.
lornally2010-02-03 10:28:20 +0000 #5
very reasonable, this is the traditional power or the power of habit, or a cultural force.

tennis inside the irrational things like living to.

, however, seems to professional tennis has been the highest in the project the.

other items inside the unreasonable things even more numerous.

However, I support you, let peace with fan, variable Shashi Hou, this can be changed.
Shimokawa life2010-02-03 10:20:55 +0000 #6
In fact, the tennis Eagle Eye to a large extent is not entirely accurate to replay the operation of the ball trajectory, and spin the ball a few larger, the less accurate playback of the tracks, this one; Hawkeye replay will take time, from access to information, to play to the big screen and then to play completed a total need for about half a minute, if controversial, there are three balls in each bureau, then a Bureau Duoliaoyifen and a half minutes on average, if the players fined again because of dissatisfaction with the results with the referee to blow off steam, then game time may be prolonged for an hour or even half an hour, so a long time, both for the television, or on-site audience, or the coherence of the race are not any good, this second; if it no longer rely on large-scale use Hawkeye referee, then the majority of tennis referee will face the plight of laid-off, this third. In conclusion, the use of Eagle Eye can only be an opportunity to appeal to the players and want to truly replace the referee is probably unlikely.
pig_232010-02-03 11:05:26 +0000 #7
First of all, Eagle Eye is costly. Secondly, the game is not conducive to smooth conduct. Third, the impact of emotions players

Reply

Name:
Content:


Other posts in this category